Vp Shunt Vs Etv

Etv surgery is a better form of treatment for children who have obstructive hydrocephalus which is the type of hydrocephalus that occurs when the fluid buildup is due to a blockage that prevents the flow of csf.

Vp shunt vs etv. However it does have a disadvantage. As the name suggests the catheter that is inserted diverts the cerebrospinal fluid csf from the lateral ventricles of the brain into the peritoneum. The main purpose of this study is to compare two types of treatment of hydrocephalus.

A second goal of this study will be to understand how the two different types of procedures vp shunt versus etv affect brain blood flow and pressures. Vp shunts tend to be more effective in more severe cases of hydrocephalus. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy etv.

Some ambiguity remains regarding indications safety and efficacy for these procedures in different clinical scenarios. Treatment in which an endoscope is used to puncture a membrane in the floor of the third ventricle creating a pathway for csf flow within the cavities in the brain. The use of primary and secondary endoscopic third ventriculostomy with and without choroid plexus cauterization has been the subjective of many studies.

Treatment options for hydrocephalus include endoscopic third ventriculostomy etv and ventriculoperitoneal shunt vps. The chances of improving may be lower with etv compared to a shunt. A lower long term complication rate compared to a shunt.